![]() ![]() Throughout the book, Friedan writes in first person, explaining her own dawning realization of the concepts laid out in each chapter. Due to these criticisms, discussions of The Feminine Mystique often involve caveats about its shifting relationships to contemporary norms. The Feminine Mystique has also drawn criticism for its negative tone toward gay men and women.įormally, the book’s reliance on thinkers such as Freud, Margaret Mead, and Alfred Kinsey has eroded some of its timelessness, as these theorists themselves have been criticized for flawed research methodology in the decades since Friedan penned her book. Feminist and social activist bell hooks famously criticized this narrow focus in the introduction to her 1984 book From Margin to Center, noting that Friedan wrote as if she were speaking of a universal female experience when in reality she was only speaking of a specific kind of woman. Friedan concentrates on the plight of the white middle- and upper-class housewife, almost entirely ignoring lower-class women and women of color. ![]() While the book’s impact and historical significance is undeniable, contemporary commentators have critiqued some elements of its content. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |